JMIR Diabetes
Emerging technologies, medical devices, apps, sensors, and informatics to help people with diabetes
Editor-in-Chief:
Ricardo Correa, MD, EdD (Co-Editor-in-Chief), Cleveland Clinic, United States Sheyu Li, MD (Co-Editor-in-Chief), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
Impact Factor 2.9 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 5.0 More information about CiteScore
Recent Articles

Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), sensor-augmented pumps (SAPs), and automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have substantially improved glycemic outcomes for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, these technologies also generate frequent alarms and alerts that may contribute to emotional burden, alarm fatigue, and maladaptive behavioral responses. Despite increasing recognition of alarm-related distress, little is known about how alarm burden differs across contemporary diabetes technologies.



Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases among adolescents and is posing a threat to health and potentially endangering life. It can have a significant impact on the physical, social, and emotional development of adolescents. Understanding the lived experiences of adolescents with T1DM is crucial for improving their health outcomes and future aspirations. However, there is currently limited research, and existing studies on psychosocial and self-care perspectives do not highlight their lived experiences in Ethiopia.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has transformed diabetes management and research by providing high-frequency data that address many of the limitations of hemoglobin A, enabling more precise clinical treatment targets and responsive trial endpoints. The richness and complexity of high-resolution time-series CGM data have spurred the development of numerous metrics for both clinical care and research applications. Beyond established metrics, there is a growing set of clinical, composite, and research-oriented measures that may support clinical decision support, intervention planning, risk stratification, and discovery-oriented research. This proliferation has created significant challenges in metric selection, interpretation, calculation, and standardization, particularly when metrics are applied across different devices, populations, software packages, and study designs.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects approximately 590 million people worldwide, and its management relies heavily on patient education. With the emergence of online health information and artificial intelligence (AI) large language models, patients are increasingly sourcing medical information independently.


Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are serious complications of diabetes that contribute substantially to morbidity, mortality, and health care burden. Accurate and timely wound assessment is essential for effective DFU management; however, conventional assessment methods are limited by subjectivity, time constraints, and interobserver variability.

Digital therapeutics integrating continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with personalized lifestyle coaching can enhance glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, real-world evidence evaluating such multicomponent interventions—combining CGM with nutrition coaching, physiotherapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy within a unified digital platform—remains limited in South Asian populations.

Digital twin (DT) systems have emerged as a promising approach in health care, enabling real-time, patient-specific virtual modeling and personalized interventions. In diabetes care, DTs offer the potential to revolutionize glucose management, decision support, and therapy personalization through integration of real-time and longitudinal patient data.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus, a public health challenge, disproportionately impacts low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), accounting for 73% of global cases. Due to resource constraints, these nations have adopted task-shifting strategies using community health workers (CHWs). However, evidence on the effectiveness of training CHWs in diabetes management is limited and, at most, indirect due to the limited studies, variable training methods, and complex interventions that make it difficult to isolate training effects.
Preprints Open for Peer Review
Open Peer Review Period:
-






